3 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
OnlineWalkThru said in April 11th, 2007 at 5:14 am

Erik,
You bring up a valid point. While some agents may also be experienced photographers, most would be best served by bringing in a professional.

Over the last couple of weeks at Vox Pop we have considered a few tips on getting some placeholder shots if your pro is not immediately available to shoot.

I hope more agents begin to realize that saving a few bucks on a photographer is usually “penny wise and pound foolish.”

mygif
Phil Thomas Di Giulio said in April 13th, 2007 at 10:42 pm

It’s a good point and WellcomeMat thinks the same about video. Is bad quality a good marketing move, or a public black eye? Imagery is extremely important as it’s often the first opportunity for someone to make an emotional connection with the property. Yes, video is new and hot: the do-it-yourself videos are fine now, but we would argue that quality is very quickly going to be absolutely necessary for video to do a realtor/seller justice. OnlineWalkThrough and other video Pros such as Fred Light (NH) and Dave Herring (FL) are leading the way.

Dave’s Channel:
http://www.wellcomemat.com/preview/v/154

Freds Channel: http://www.wellcomemat.com/preview/v/714

mygif
shaun mclane said in April 16th, 2007 at 7:32 pm

This seems to be a popular topic. I agree that video is the way of the future, an as it becomes more and more popular, clients will expect better quality. I have been doing video walkthroughs for 9 months, and my first was horrible – but the client loved it (amazing how iDVD can dress up trash). Now I have a fancy tripod, better camera, video lighting, etc. It’s a lot of work to do on your own, but it gets easier with each tour.