13 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
dean said in August 17th, 2007 at 10:50 am

Erik,

It’s dean with Domus, we met through Kevin Boer at Inman.

I like your premise and examples. My only concern is with seo and how such a url will place in a Google search. If you blog about your domain it will get traffic. But as a stand alone I am not sure?

Your blog looks great!

Dean Guadagni

mygif

[...] Erik Hersman — When You Should Consider Using Property Specific Domains to Sell Your Home [...]

mygif

[...] When You Should Consider Using Property Specific Domains to Sell Your Home Summary: Tips on when a property for sale should have it’s own website address. [...]

mygif
David G from Zillow.com said in August 20th, 2007 at 10:20 am

Great post. Finally some sanity is bought to this topic. This list is on the money.

mygif
Erik Hersman said in August 20th, 2007 at 10:55 am

Dean, SEO value is a great point to bring up, and something I didn’t talk about in the post. I would say that there are 2 things to consider here.

First, you’d still want to list your property on other listing sites, or offline publications, that have a high volume of the right types of clientele. That should be the initial drive and the initial linking to the property specific domain.

Second, in the scenarios that I suggest utilizing a domain for a specific piece of property, you’re looking at it likely being on the market for a little while anyway. The longer it’s up, coupled with the links from listing sites and your own site, will help it make it through Google’s sandbox.

One last point. The perception of the property is what you’re really working on here. The search value can be improved if possible, but what you’re really trying to do is showcase the property in an even better way than within a simple listings engine.

mygif
Real Estate Blogger said in August 21st, 2007 at 8:57 am

Great post, great topic!

I’ll agree completely that property specific URIs are not the greatest thing in the world, I also think we’re going to see more and more of their use in the near future. If for no other reason, as agents and brokers continue to discover they can grab a domain name for 7 bucks a year, the bandwagon effect will boomerang.

By the way, what an awesome example of an individual property listing website. If only all real estate sites were that functional and eye appealing at the same time…

mygif
Dean Guadagni said in August 21st, 2007 at 11:39 am

Erik,

I must agree with you. Your second point especially escaped me. I failed to consider that the combination of time online, links to listing sights, and the link to your own site will increase traffic and search ease.

Nice volley Erik!

Dean G.

mygif
homes said in August 21st, 2007 at 10:50 pm

Great balls of fire Erik. I say, you also need to do link exchange by having some related blogs link to your blog site in this way you can increase your PR (page rank) from which is one of the components that google are considering in search engine results.

Hope I explain it clear.

mygif
Rebecca Levinson said in August 22nd, 2007 at 11:25 am

As to the first comment on this post, let’s not forget that the property URL should be emblazoned on every other piece of marketing collateral that the property is being advertised on. Hey, how about having the owner of the property pitch in and (in the case of a long term sale), start helping to expose his property by putting it in his/her personal email signature line, possibly even getting an automobile decale.

mygif

[...] Especially classy are the photos, not only in content and quality, but also in their presentation on the website.  Seems to have almost a hi-def flavor to me.  I’d like to see more real estate property websites look just like this.  Thanks to Realty Thoughts for leading me too this example. [...]

mygif

[...] When You Should Consider Using Property Specific Domains to Sell Your Home [...]

mygif
Jesse Kaye said in August 26th, 2007 at 6:12 pm

I could see purchasing a domain name for a building with several units. Not for a single family home. Just seems silly.

I would rather put that money towards an ad words campaign geared towards a specific property.

Just my two cents.

Jesse Kaye
http://greatunionhomes.com

mygif
Steven Schafer said in October 23rd, 2007 at 6:16 am

An interesting article, but it opens up a pandoras box of thought. If someone is good enough to create a home specific website than they might be smart enough to just make a home specific page on their already existing website and enjoy any ranking they already have from that site.
As far as buying a home specific url, I feel for the agents who believe that $ 9.23 is too much to spend on marketing a property. Maybe next time you take a listing you could just ask the seller to pay you the commission up front. As a virtual tour provider in the South Florida market I consistently notice one thing, those that continue to push and those who have every reason in the world why they can’t make money in the market. This downturn might just be what the doctor ordered. Sellers deserve strong marketers, nothing less. When an agent is looking for a way to get additional exposure on a home I often suggest that they purchase a home specific url, a matching sign rider and then forwards that url directly into the virtual tour. From the tour the buyer prospect can link through to the agents email or website. If you want to see samples or want more details please take a look at my site at http://www.mls-tours.com

Steven