Steven
]]>I would rather put that money towards an ad words campaign geared towards a specific property.
Just my two cents.
Jesse Kaye
http://greatunionhomes.com
Hope I explain it clear.
]]>I must agree with you. Your second point especially escaped me. I failed to consider that the combination of time online, links to listing sights, and the link to your own site will increase traffic and search ease.
Nice volley Erik!
Dean G.
]]>I’ll agree completely that property specific URIs are not the greatest thing in the world, I also think we’re going to see more and more of their use in the near future. If for no other reason, as agents and brokers continue to discover they can grab a domain name for 7 bucks a year, the bandwagon effect will boomerang.
By the way, what an awesome example of an individual property listing website. If only all real estate sites were that functional and eye appealing at the same time…
]]>First, you’d still want to list your property on other listing sites, or offline publications, that have a high volume of the right types of clientele. That should be the initial drive and the initial linking to the property specific domain.
Second, in the scenarios that I suggest utilizing a domain for a specific piece of property, you’re looking at it likely being on the market for a little while anyway. The longer it’s up, coupled with the links from listing sites and your own site, will help it make it through Google’s sandbox.
One last point. The perception of the property is what you’re really working on here. The search value can be improved if possible, but what you’re really trying to do is showcase the property in an even better way than within a simple listings engine.
]]>